The stores are awash in red and pink. It can only mean Valentine’s Day is upon us.
There was a time when I looked forward to Valentine’s Day. True, it was about 50-some years ago, back when I was in elementary school in New York City, but it was a pretty darn exciting day plus there was candy involved. It wasn’t because I came home with 31 Valentine’s cards, one from every boy and girl in my class; it was more because I didn’t. If I was lucky, I got one special card from one special someone, although I remember there were a few years when there were several special cards from several special someones. I was probably working that pigtails and lost-tooth look. And, of course, there was the inevitable card from the “eww” boy — the freckly kid who picked his nose whenever he was nervous and whose fly was always open, or the one with the crew cut who never got an answer right when the teacher called on him and had a faint smell of liverwurst.
Still, Valentine’s Day meant something back then. You didn’t have to express your feelings for the entire class and give each kid a card just because it wouldn’t be “nice” to exclude anyone, like kids have to do nowadays. You were allowed to love whom you wanted to love, even if it wasn’t reciprocated. Heartbreak came with the territory, and we were learning to accept that.
Over the years Valentine’s Day lost a lot of its specialness. Even marriage didn’t quite salvage it; in fact, it often made it worse. A pricey sparkly something or a dozen red roses can make a wife feel like it’s a quick and easy apology after some dreadful slight — real or imagined — her hubby bestowed upon her. Or, worse, it raises suspicions — why is he being so nice to me all of a sudden?
Several years ago, I had met a man online who wanted to take me out to lunch on Valentine’s Day. The problem was, it would only be our second date — as much as I don’t care about V-Day, I was aware that others do and it felt awkward. He kept pushing and I finally relented. He showed up with a box of chocolates and a red rose. What might have been a sweet gesture if we’d been seeing each other for a while seemed forced, like he was following some sort of guy list — Flowers? Check. Chocolate? Check. Restaurant? Check? — instead of understanding where we were in our relationship, which was we didn’t even have a relationship! We didn’t go out again.
Special or not, Valentine’s has remained one of those days you’re forced to pay attention to because it evidently proves just how loved you are. A lot of people file for divorce depending on how their spouse treats them on Valentine’s Day. Can this marriage be saved with an oyster-champagne-chocolate dinner at a chi-chi restaurant?
But nothing is worse than being unattached on Valentine’s Day. Not that we singletons have a problem with the day itself — we don’t. It’s a Hallmark holiday, after all, one with such heightened expectations that you have to wonder who can even enjoy it anymore. It’s just that the so-called relationship experts are constantly bombarding us with advice and tips on how to “cope” or “survive” the day — like it’s a disease! — and offering ways to “love ourselves.” Too bad most of the advice has us pampering ourselves in ways that we’ll still be paying for next Valentine’s Day, either as charges on our credit cards or extra pounds on our body.
It’s the adult version of giving everyone in the classroom a card; we must be “nice” to ourselves. Why should we be excluded just because we don’t have a partner on a day that celebrates romance?
Google “surviving Valentine’s Day” and you’ll get more than 3.8 million results; “coping Valentine’s Day” brings more than 1 million, “single on Valentine’s Day” brings 123 million results and “divorced on Valentine’s Day” brings 935,000 results. “Alone,” “unattached,” “solo” and other buzz words that may convince you that you’re so unloved and unlovable, why are you even pretending you’re happy have their own disturbing Google “results.”
Of course, it’s mostly (only?) women who feel that way. I don’t think too many men are tweaked if they’re single on V-Day and I’m guessing a lot of attached guys wouldn’t feel too bad if their partner somehow forgot about it, especially since guys mostly have to fund it. Not to say many some would object to getting something special from their partner — as long as being naked was involved. Many some lingerie.
The truth is most of us wouldn’t feel so bad about Valentine’s Day if the messages we kept hearing didn’t insist that we do feel bad or that we should. Honestly, I’d much rather be single than in a marriage so fragile that it could bust apart depending on how my hubby treated me on one day of the year.
What about you?
- Do you celebrate Valentine’s Day even if you don’t have a partner?
- Guys, do you?
- How important is it to have someone make you feel special on V-Day?
- What do you actual want on Valentine’s Day?
“Your sweetie can have the biggest, thickest member on the planet and have all the right moves and then some, but the sex will still suck if you’re thinking about how much you have to prepare for your board meeting tomorrow.”
I thought size did not matter for women? LMAO!
I really scoff at the notion.
Twitter: OMGchronicles
says:
Yes, size matters a bit (but you knew that!) I was just making the point that a distracted mind = bad sex no matter how sexy your partner is.