Feed on
Posts
Comments

I have been vacationing the past week and blissfully away from the Internet for most of the time. But before I left I’d made note of an article about Amy Friedman, a journalist who fell in love with an inmate — a murderer and former drug dealer — and who recently wrote a memoir about her seven-year marriage to him, Desperado’s Wife. Loving an inmate

I struggled with not being judgmental about it — can it really be true that most women are attracted to bad boys or so “crazy for romance” that they will fall for a killer? — but then it became something much bigger than that. I was curious to know more about what would make a woman fall in love with a man in jail (and as much as I’d love to say “a man fall in love with a woman in jail” evidently it’s much more of a gal than guy thing, despite the presumably hard work of dating websites like Meet an Inmate and Inmate Connections).

Yes, there can be a pathology to women like Friedman who fall for an inmate; many have a “wound,” as Visiting Life: Women Doing Time on the Outside author Bridget Kinsella says or have a “need for a safe, idealized, romantic fantasy of love” that “transcends judgment” as Women Who Love Men Who Kill author Sheila Isenberg says.

Still, as one woman notes, how much do we really know about a person we meet online or on the street; being incarcerated for a drug offense or murder at least offers us some info. And there are about 2 million people in jail.

I turned to the forums on Prison Talk, a website for those wih incarcerated loved ones, and what grabbed me were the answers to the post on why women fall in love with inmates. While there were various responses, the recurring theme was this: I saw him for the man he is.

If that is true, what keeps us from seeing a man or woman for who he or she is outside of prison? Is it because sex — or “other stuff” — happens too quickly and complicates things? What keeps people on the “outside” — not incarcerated — from seeing the “real” man/woman?

Kinsella says the constrained relationship with her incarcerated lover helped her discover passion and compassion:
“I know that I have the ability to have this intense, close, intimate relationship with someone I can’t be sexually intimate with, and that might help me to be more trusting and able to take a leap of faith with someone else.”
Perhaps a lot of that is self-delusion. But, there might be something to slowly revealing ourselves by letters, phone calls and limited face-to-face conversations that creates more intimacy, openness and — one hopes — honesty.
  • Is there an upside to having a constrained relationship?
  • Can we access intense intimacy and truly learn about the “real” person without having to fall in love with someone in the slammer?
  • Does getting sexual too quickly impact self-disclosure or cloud our judgment?

Photo © Wolfgang Mette/Fotolia.com

2 Responses to “Is there an upside to having a constrained relationship?”

  1. Onely says:

    Is there an upside to having a constrained relationship?

    I think that our concept of a romantic relationship is that is is all-encompassing, that the two people are each other’s worlds, etc etc–which makes anything that is less than that “constrained”, when really it is just another kind of romantic relationship.

    That said, the whole marrying-the-inmate thing does weird me out and I should get that book to either expand my mind or revel in purile judgement, whichever happens!!

    Thanks for the heads-up.
    Christina

    • OMGchronicles
      Twitter: OMGchronicles
      says:

      There are many ways to have a relationship; that said, I can’t see any being “healthy” if respect, compassion, honesty and intimacy were missing. That may “constrain” some people!

Leave a Reply