Feed on
Posts
Comments

I consider myself pretty lucky that when I divorced, my former spouse and I were civil enough — or maybe just to cheap! — to mediate and avoid lawyers and stay out of family court.  And, we agreed that we would coparent 50-50, one week on, one week off.

It hasn’t always been easy for any of us, but considering some of the horrible stories out there, our lives post-divorce seem like a breeze.

Except there’s one thing that I didn’t fully realize — just how entwined our lives would remain.

Most of us who are thinking about leaving our marriage imagine divorce will be like this: Freedom.

Not!

My first divorce was; I haven’t had contact with my first hubby in decades. But, we didn’t have kids and therein lies the rub — just because you’re not living together doesn’t mean that former spouses aren’t dealing with each other when they have kids. Thankfully, my kids’ dad and I are friendly — I know many divorced couples who aren’t. So, I eagerly devoured Patrick Parkinson’s book, “Family Law and the Indissolubility of Parenthood” (Cambridge University Press, 2012), which came out a few months ago. 

As the University of Sydney professor of law says, “The experience of the last forty years has shown that whereas marriage may be freely dissoluble, parenthood is not.”

The family law model we’re still using dates back to the 1960s and ’70s, which assumed divorce was a clean break. He went his way, she went hers — with the kids — and all was (presumably) good.

But rarely has that been true, and family law reforms have radically changed that. Most divorcees learn relatively quickly — and perhaps shockingly — that a former spouse still has a say, and can nix our plans to move away for a new job or a new love. “The promise of personal autonomy and a new beginning that the divorce revolution offered has proven largely to be an illusion,” he writes. Divorce is no longer the end of a relationship; it’s a “restructuring of a continuing relationship.”

Which has made some of us post-divorce as miserable as we were in our marriage.

“People in unhappy marriages do not look to divorce as a way to restructure the relationship with their partners. They look to divorce to end that relationships, to set them free to start a new life, perhaps to move to a new location and to form new relationships,” he says.

There have more custody battles in recent years because — guess what? — dads, who were mostly absent in the old days, are now desiring more custody time. It’s a great thing, but, as he notes, “Because fathers demand a greater involvement in their children’s lives after separation, there has been increasing conflict both at a policy level and at the individual level of litigated cases.”

I was particularly interested in what he had to say about fathers. First, he cites a study that states, despite the rhetoric of father’s rights groups, more dads want to “assist in the parenting role after separation than take over as primary caregiver.” (That study dates back to 1993, however, and is limited to Canada; I’d love to see a more recent study).

And he notes although it has been increasing over time, many dads do “drop out” of their kids’ lives. Why? “(S)erious conflict in the relationship with the mother, leading to maternal gateclosing; repartnering and responsibilities to children in the new family; physical distance; feelings of disenfranchisement by the legal system; and limited financial resources. Most of these men would want a greater involvement in the children’s lives if their circumstances were different.”

I wish he broke that down by percentages — how many men get tired fighting a former wife’s gateclosing and give up versus, say, remarrying — but they come from several studies,

Dads increasingly want more meaning and connection with their kids:

Separation motivates some fathers to rethink their priorities and to try to maintain their connections to children even if this means struggle and conflict. Because fathers demand a greater involvement in their children’s lives after separation, there has been increasing conflict both at a policy level and at the individual level of litigated cases.

The kids want it, too:

(Y)oung adults who lived in sole-custody arrangements expressed more feelings of loss and more often viewed their lives through the lens of divorce, compared to those young adults who grew up in more shared physical custody arrangements.

He then takes a look at who did the primary caregiving in the marriage, and questions if that should determine how much time the nonresident parent, typically Dad, has after divorce, so-called past-caretaking standard. There are many legal incentives and it’s just plain efficient to specialize in a marriage, and that works against dads, who are often the breadwinners and not the primary caretakers:

The argument that fathers should not have a greater role in parenting after separation than they had before separation ignores the significance of the change that separation can make to fathers’ attitudes to the parenting role.

He cites a study that found that dads often shift their priorities after divorce, such as leaving the workforce or cutting back on hours, to be with their kids more.

There is a big global push toward shared parenting, but, as he notes, that is often dangerous to children in high-conflict families. And even in no-conflict families, the kids reported it was most successful if they felt at home in both households, if there was enough flexibility to allow for changing needs and circumstances, and, most important, whether the arrangement was based on the needs and wishes of the parents or the kids. Meaning, the parents would have to act like adults and put their kids’ needs first, which many do not. And sometimes, the kids say they want that arrangement by trying to be fair to both their parents, not themselves.

In any event, he says “Coparenting after divorce, whatever form it takes, requires new patterns of parenting to be developed in the very different circumstances that exist for the enduring family.” I couldn’t agree more, and this important book, which I will refer to in future columns, is leading the way.

  • Do you have shared custody?
  • Do you see more dads wanting more time with their kids post-divorce?


7 Responses to “What do fathers want after divorce?”

  1. Family Mediator
    Twitter: LHMediation
    says:

    Hi Vicki,

    Thank you for sharing this personal story. You are right on when you say that many couples get divorced looking for freedom from their former spouse. As a family mediator, I often work with parents going through the divorce process. It’s not uncommon to see one or both parents have an ‘aha’ moment during mediation where they realize that their relationship with their former spouse will not end when they divorce. The relationship will change but in most cases the former couples will see each other at least once a week and will have quite a few issues to communicate about as their child(ren) age.

    Seattle Based Mediator
    http://www.LighthouseMediation.com

    425.533.8322

    • OMGchronicles
      Twitter: OMGchronicles
      says:

      Thanks for writing. I didn’t quite get that, either, when we were divorcing. It has sometimes been challenging (and oftentimes a reminder about how happy I am to no longer be married to my kids’ dad!) but I really do think we have put the kids first.

  2. My clients tended to be the ones who already knew this. But even those who did usually did see the judgement as the “end” whereas I always saw it as the beginning. It’s not just parenting-it is also child support. Kids are expensive. They get much more expensive if there is constant bickering in court over who pays and who benefits from child support.

    I shudder to think what these children are learning about what a marriage is. Yes, mt parents had a ‘clean break” when my mother divorced my dad- I didn’t see him for 20 years.

    I am childless… and husbandless. My childhood is why. MUCH needs to change.

    • OMGchronicles
      Twitter: OMGchronicles
      says:

      Thanks for commenting Carroll.
      I am sorry that you are childless and husbandless because of your childhood. That’s giving your parents too much power of you (still).
      It’s funny (sad, actually) how people focus so much on the money/property and getting revenge at the expense of their children during a divorce. Seeing how much people can lose (especially men), I just can’t see anyone marrying nowadays without some sort of prenup.

  3. Dtrevino says:

    In my experience, it seems true that parents want to share more time with their children after divorce than during the marriage–either because they took their family for granted during the marriage or they just hated being home. In California, custody is a factor in the amount of child support a parent pays. On the positive side, it forces parents to be involved in the lives of the children. It seems like a lot more dads are around, and that is a good thing. For a few, however, it forces a child to exist when an uninterested parent just wants to pay less child support. It just proves that laws cannot fix everyone.

  4. Emily Louise says:

    Hey, I am currently 15 and my parents divorced when I was 5. I don’t remember much from that time other than my mum restricting my sister and I from seeing our dad for a long time. When she divorced him she put an AVO order against him so that he couldn’t go near us or anything, even though he never once hit or hurt my mum. Over the years i’ve been put through alot of custody battles, mediation and 2 broken homes isn’t really the perfect childhood. Being ripped from one house to another throughout my life has had a massive impact on my younger sister and I. The court orders made us live with our mum (full time) and see our dad every second weekend and wednesday. Which is hard on the distance we have to travel to and from. Aswell as school issues, puberty, bullying and other committments in our lives. I moved in with my dad 3 months ago and I love it. Other than my mum just won’tlet this happen. She said she won’t agree to anything and will only talk to me (HER OWN DAUGHTER) only through mediation.
    The only reason there has been so many arguments and custody battles is because my mother has the need to feel ‘power’ and likes the bonuses the government gives to single, unemployed women with children, plus a wealthy child suppot salary. I’ve suffered a massive deal of depression & anxiety from the amount of pressure and stress from everything. And I believe I am going to grow up and raise my future children in a happy household with an unbroken family. I never want to revisit my childhood again. I personally think that greed can overtake a persons life and manipulate the way they treat others and portray their lives. The impact divorce has had on me has emotionally ruined my self esteem and my life.

    • OMGchronicles
      Twitter: OMGchronicles
      says:

      Thanks so much for sharing, Emily Louise, although that is a hard story to hear. It seems to me that it wasn’t so much the divorce that hurt you as your mother’s control of the situation and keeping you from having meaningful time with your dad. I hope you and your family can come to some peace and forgiveness, and reconnect as a family again. I wish you the best.

Leave a Reply